Detached car port to the front elevation
📊
See the success rate & inspector analytics
Free to view — just create an account, no payment needed.
Sign Up FreeTechnical Issues Heatmap
Character & Appearance
Trees & Landscape
Open Space
Inspector’s Reasoning
Appeal Decision
Site visit made on 17 February 2026
by S Leonard BA (Hons) BTP MRTPI
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State
Decision date: 27th February 2026
Appeal Ref: 6002877
194 Warsash Road, Warsash, Hampshire SO31 9JF
• The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended)
against a refusal to grant planning permission.
• The appeal is made by Martin King against the decision of Fareham Borough Council.
• The application Ref is P/25/1233/FP.
• The development proposed is detached car port to the front elevation.
Decision
1. The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for detached car port to
the front elevation at 194 Warsash Road, Warsash, Hampshire SO31 9JF in
accordance with the terms of application Ref P/25/1233/FP subject to the
conditions listed at the end of this Decision.
Main Issue
2. The main issue is the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of
the area.
Reasons
3. The appeal property comprises a detached chalet bungalow located on the south
side of Warsash Road in an established residential area within the urban
settlement boundary.
4. The road comprises a main route linking the urban areas of Titchfield and
Warsash. As such, it is wide and busy. It also comprises a variety of different
property designs, including predominantly detached, houses, chalet bungalows
and bungalows. Throughout the road there are a mix of dwelling materials, roof
forms, front building lines and frontage boundary treatments.
5. Properties are generally set well-back from the road frontage, and where the front
boundary treatment comprises low boundary walls, fences or landscaping, this has
resulted in an open and spacious street scene. The appeal site lies in such a
stretch of the road where it forms one of a row of bungalows and chalet bungalows
which are highly visible from the street due to their low front and side boundary
walls which enclose large and open front gardens.
6. The host property is set well-back from the appeal site frontage behind a
predominantly gravel-surfaced front garden which is used for parking. In this
respect, the appellant has confirmed that the existing garage to the rear of the
Appeal Decision 6002877
2
dwelling and its access driveway are too narrow to satisfactorily accommodate a
modern car.
7. The proposed car port would be positioned adjacent to the site frontage and the
neighbouring site at No.192. As such, it would be highly visible from the public
realm and would result in some erosion of the spacious front garden area and
some obscuring of the front elevation of the property.
8. However, due to the permeable open-sided design of the proposal, together with
its low height and shallow hipped roof, the impact upon site openness would not
be significant. Also, it would only occupy a modest proportion of the overall front
garden area.
9. Moreover, the current use of the land in front of the dwelling, including the ground
where the car port would be sited, for the parking of vehicles, means that
spaciousness within the front garden area of the property is already eroded to a
large extent and the proposal would only result in a small degree of additional
obscuring of the front of the dwelling in views from the road.
10. The proposal would be viewed as a subsidiary light-weight timber structure within
the front garden which would retain the visual prominence of the dwelling in views
from the road and would not appear unduly visually dominant or enclosing within
the streetscape.
11. There are no similarly positioned structures along the south side of Warsash Road
within the row of bungalows and chalet bungalows within which the appeal site
sits. However, I saw during my site visit, that frontage treatments within the road
are very mixed, and that within the locality of the appeal site there are garage
buildings within some front gardens. These include No.174 on the same side of the
road and Nos. 177, 179, 185 and 189 on the north side of the road. These
buildings have a more solid and enclosing design than the appeal scheme.
12. Moreover, I also saw that many frontages along this section of the road have lost
their street-facing openness due to the presence of mature boundary landscaping
and trees.
13. As such, I find that the proposed car port would not appear unduly incongruous
within the overall prevailing mixed character street scene of this part of Warsash
Road and that screening the car port by means of landscape planting would not be
necessary to make the scheme acceptable.
14. Having regard to the above, I therefore conclude that the proposal would not
materially harm the character and appearance of the area. As such, it would
accord with Policy D1 of the Fareham Local Plan 2037 (April 2023) in so much as
this policy, amongst other things, seeks to ensure that new development will be of
high-quality design to and responds appropriately to the positive elements of local
character.
15. This accords with Chapter 12 of the National Planning Policy Framework 2024
which seeks to achieve well-designed places.
Conditions
16. I have considered the imposition of conditions in light of the tests set out in
Paragraph 57 of the Framework and the National Planning Practice Guidance
Appeal Decision 6002877
3
(PPG). In addition to the standard implementation condition (1), it is
necessary to define the plans in the interests of certainty (2). Given the visual
prominence of the proposal it is necessary to ensure that the external materials of
the development are appropriate, in the interests of the character and appearance
of the area (3).
Conclusion
17. For the above reasons, I conclude that the appeal should succeed, and that
planning permission be granted subject to conditions.
S Leonard
INSPECTOR
Schedule of Conditions
1) The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of 3 years
from the date of this permission.
2) The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the
following plans: Buy a Plan Location Plan Ordnance Survey Ref 00781125-
B6183F; Buy a Plan Site Plan Ordnance Survey Ref 00781126-FD3BA1 and Floor
Elevations and Roof Plan Ref Hampshire Garden Structures A.
3) The development hereby permitted shall be constructed in timber in accordance
with the external materials specified within the Design and Access Statement.
***End of Conditions***
Expert Representation
Don't leave your appeal to chance.
Inspectors are inconsistent. We build a technical defense using precedents from our 182,000+ case archive.
No win, no fee Householder representation — you only pay if you win.