Detached car port to the front elevation

📊

See the success rate & inspector analytics

Free to view — just create an account, no payment needed.

Sign Up Free

Technical Issues Heatmap

Character & Appearance
Trees & Landscape
Open Space

Inspector’s Reasoning

Appeal Decision Site visit made on 17 February 2026 by S Leonard BA (Hons) BTP MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 27th February 2026 Appeal Ref: 6002877 194 Warsash Road, Warsash, Hampshire SO31 9JF • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Martin King against the decision of Fareham Borough Council. • The application Ref is P/25/1233/FP. • The development proposed is detached car port to the front elevation. Decision 1. The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for detached car port to the front elevation at 194 Warsash Road, Warsash, Hampshire SO31 9JF in accordance with the terms of application Ref P/25/1233/FP subject to the conditions listed at the end of this Decision. Main Issue 2. The main issue is the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area. Reasons 3. The appeal property comprises a detached chalet bungalow located on the south side of Warsash Road in an established residential area within the urban settlement boundary. 4. The road comprises a main route linking the urban areas of Titchfield and Warsash. As such, it is wide and busy. It also comprises a variety of different property designs, including predominantly detached, houses, chalet bungalows and bungalows. Throughout the road there are a mix of dwelling materials, roof forms, front building lines and frontage boundary treatments. 5. Properties are generally set well-back from the road frontage, and where the front boundary treatment comprises low boundary walls, fences or landscaping, this has resulted in an open and spacious street scene. The appeal site lies in such a stretch of the road where it forms one of a row of bungalows and chalet bungalows which are highly visible from the street due to their low front and side boundary walls which enclose large and open front gardens. 6. The host property is set well-back from the appeal site frontage behind a predominantly gravel-surfaced front garden which is used for parking. In this respect, the appellant has confirmed that the existing garage to the rear of the Appeal Decision 6002877 2 dwelling and its access driveway are too narrow to satisfactorily accommodate a modern car. 7. The proposed car port would be positioned adjacent to the site frontage and the neighbouring site at No.192. As such, it would be highly visible from the public realm and would result in some erosion of the spacious front garden area and some obscuring of the front elevation of the property. 8. However, due to the permeable open-sided design of the proposal, together with its low height and shallow hipped roof, the impact upon site openness would not be significant. Also, it would only occupy a modest proportion of the overall front garden area. 9. Moreover, the current use of the land in front of the dwelling, including the ground where the car port would be sited, for the parking of vehicles, means that spaciousness within the front garden area of the property is already eroded to a large extent and the proposal would only result in a small degree of additional obscuring of the front of the dwelling in views from the road. 10. The proposal would be viewed as a subsidiary light-weight timber structure within the front garden which would retain the visual prominence of the dwelling in views from the road and would not appear unduly visually dominant or enclosing within the streetscape. 11. There are no similarly positioned structures along the south side of Warsash Road within the row of bungalows and chalet bungalows within which the appeal site sits. However, I saw during my site visit, that frontage treatments within the road are very mixed, and that within the locality of the appeal site there are garage buildings within some front gardens. These include No.174 on the same side of the road and Nos. 177, 179, 185 and 189 on the north side of the road. These buildings have a more solid and enclosing design than the appeal scheme. 12. Moreover, I also saw that many frontages along this section of the road have lost their street-facing openness due to the presence of mature boundary landscaping and trees. 13. As such, I find that the proposed car port would not appear unduly incongruous within the overall prevailing mixed character street scene of this part of Warsash Road and that screening the car port by means of landscape planting would not be necessary to make the scheme acceptable. 14. Having regard to the above, I therefore conclude that the proposal would not materially harm the character and appearance of the area. As such, it would accord with Policy D1 of the Fareham Local Plan 2037 (April 2023) in so much as this policy, amongst other things, seeks to ensure that new development will be of high-quality design to and responds appropriately to the positive elements of local character. 15. This accords with Chapter 12 of the National Planning Policy Framework 2024 which seeks to achieve well-designed places. Conditions 16. I have considered the imposition of conditions in light of the tests set out in Paragraph 57 of the Framework and the National Planning Practice Guidance Appeal Decision 6002877 3 (PPG). In addition to the standard implementation condition (1), it is necessary to define the plans in the interests of certainty (2). Given the visual prominence of the proposal it is necessary to ensure that the external materials of the development are appropriate, in the interests of the character and appearance of the area (3). Conclusion 17. For the above reasons, I conclude that the appeal should succeed, and that planning permission be granted subject to conditions. S Leonard INSPECTOR Schedule of Conditions 1) The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of 3 years from the date of this permission. 2) The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following plans: Buy a Plan Location Plan Ordnance Survey Ref 00781125- B6183F; Buy a Plan Site Plan Ordnance Survey Ref 00781126-FD3BA1 and Floor Elevations and Roof Plan Ref Hampshire Garden Structures A. 3) The development hereby permitted shall be constructed in timber in accordance with the external materials specified within the Design and Access Statement. ***End of Conditions***
Expert Representation

Don't leave your appeal to chance.

Inspectors are inconsistent. We build a technical defense using precedents from our 182,000+ case archive.
No win, no fee Householder representation — you only pay if you win.

Get Free Review How it works →