None
π
See the success rate & inspector analytics
Free to view β just create an account, no payment needed.
Sign Up FreeTechnical Issues Heatmap
Residential Amenity
Character & Appearance
Policy Weight
Inspectorβs Reasoning
Appeal Decision
Site visit made on 21 May 2025
by Juliet Rogers BA (Hons) MA MRTPI
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State
Decision date: 10 June 2025
Appeal Ref: 6000118
Proposal: single storey rear extension with roof terrace at 248B Southlands Road, Bromley BR1 2EQ
Application Ref: DC/24/04591/FULL6
Decision β planning permission is granted
Reasons
Issue β the effect on the character and appearance of the area
1. Whilst of a generous size compared to the host dwelling, the proposal would be no
deeper than existing extensions to neighbouring properties. Its simple design, use
of matching fenestration details and matching materials would complement the
existing property.
2. Although the use of balustrading is not commonplace in the immediate
surroundings to the site, its presence on the rear edge and along one side of the
proposed terrace would not be significantly harmful to the character and
appearance of the host property.
3. The proposal would not harm the character and appearance of the area and
accords with the policies cited in the decision notice.
Issue β the effect on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers of 246A and 248
Southlands Road, with regard to privacy
4. Any loss of privacy to the neighbouring occupiers of No.246A when the proposed
terrace is in use would be negligible given the almost two storey height of the
existing boundary wall on this side of the appeal site.
5. The more rearward siting of the existing terrace to the rear of No.248, combined
with the screening provided by its associated deep two storey extension restricts
the view possible from the proposed terraced area. Therefore, acceptable levels of
privacy would be maintained across a substantial proportion of this elevated
space.
6. The proposal would not harm the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers of
246A and 248, with regard to privacy, and accords with the policies cited in the
decision notice.
Appeal Decision 6000118
2
Conditions
1) The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than three years from
the date of this decision.
Reason: to comply with the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004
2) The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with
drawing nos: 24-1128 D01 rev05; 24-1128 D03 rev05; 24-1128 D05 rev05; 24-
1128 D07 rev05; and 24-1128 D08 rev05.
Reason: to provide certainty.
3) The external materials of the extension hereby permitted shall match those used
in the existing dwelling.
Reason: to preserve the character and appearance of the area.
Conclusion
7. The development complies with the development plan as a whole and nothing
indicates a decision should be made otherwise.
Juliet Rogers
INSPECTOR
Expert Representation
Don't leave your appeal to chance.
Inspectors are inconsistent. We build a technical defense using precedents from our 182,000+ case archive.
No win, no fee Householder representation β you only pay if you win.