← Back to Archive

Without planning permission: 3.1 The unauthorised construction of a single storey side to rear extension and the installation of a door in the rear elevation of the first floor rear elevation (“the Unauthorised Development”); and 3.2 The unauthorised hardsurfacing [sic] of the entire front garden (“the Unauthorised Hardstanding”) as shown hatched in blue on Plan 2

📊

Borough Success Rate

In London Borough of Harrow, approx 40.2% of Householder developments appeals are successful. (Sample: 854 cases).

Planzo Professional Representation

Don't leave your appeal to chance.

Inspectors are inconsistent. We build a technical defense using precedents from our 182,000 archive.
Fixed-fee Householder representation for £750.

Book Free Review How it works →

Technical Issues Heatmap

Green Belt Character and Appearance Privacy
Keyword Heatmap Locked

Instant scan of technical battlegrounds available with a Day Pass.

Inspector Profile: Jones R

Archive Data: 210 Decisions
Allowance Rate (Householder developments)
41.0% ↑ High
National Average (Householder developments)
35.3%

Inspector's Analysis

https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate Appeal Decision Site visit made on 24 February 2026 by Richard S Jones BA (Hons), BTP, MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 29 April 2026 Appeal Ref: APP/M5450/C/23/3325757 Land at 16 Brookshill Avenue, Harrow, HA3 6RZ • The appeal is made under section 174 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as am…

Full Analysis Locked

Unlock full text, site maps, and the evidence-ready PDF.

Unlock Case (£10)