Appeal Against Conditions
📊
See the success rate & inspector analytics
Free to view — just create an account, no payment needed.
Sign Up FreeTechnical Issues Heatmap
Residential Amenity
Extensions
Trees & Landscape
Inspector’s Reasoning
Appeal Decision
Site visit made on 12 July 2023
by N McGurk BSc (Hons) MCD MBA MRTPI
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Decision date: 31 July 2023
Appeal Ref: APP/X2410/D/23/3322346
41 Iveshead Road, Shepshed, Leicestershire, LE12 9EP
• The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
against a refusal to grant planning permission under section 73A of the Town and
Country Planning Act 1990 for the development of land carried out without complying
with conditions subject to which a previous planning permission was granted.
• The appeal is made by Mr Nick Griffiths against the decision of Charnwood Borough
Council.
• The application Ref P/23/0105/2, dated 21 January 2023, was refused by notice dated
20 March 2023.
• The application sought planning permission for erection of detached garage with office
space in eaves without complying with a condition attached to planning permission
Ref P/22/0972/2, dated 11 November 2022.
• The condition in dispute is No 3 which states that: The north facing first floor windows
on the garage hereby permitted shall be obscure-glazed to Pilkington Level 3 or
equivalent and shall be non-opening below 1.7 metres above internal floor level. These
windows shall be retained as such thereafter at all times. No changes shall be made to
these windows nor shall any additional windows be inserted in this elevation thereafter .
• The reason given for the condition is: To minimise the effect of the development on the
privacy and amenities of nearby residents in accordance with Policy CS2 of the
Charnwood Local Plan Core Strategy 2015 and the Council’s Design Supplementary
Planning Document 2020.
Decision
1. The appeal is dismissed.
Procedural Matters
2. Planning permission was granted in November 2022 for the erection of a
detached garage with office space in eaves. I observed during my site visit that
this development appears largely complete.
3. The condition in dispute, condition No 3, requires first floor north facing
windows to be obscure glazed and to be non-opening below 1.7 metres. During
my site visit, I observed that the first floor north facing windows are in breach
of this condition.
4. The application the subject of this appeal seeks the removal of condition No 3.
This condition was imposed to minimise the effect of the development on the
privacy and amenities of neighbouring occupiers.
Appeal Decision APP/X2410/D/23/3322346
2
Main Issue
5. The main issue in this case is the effect of the removal of the condition on the
living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with regards to privacy.
Reasons
6. Number 41 Iveshead Road is a two storey detached dwelling set close to the
edge of pavement along Iveshead Road in a residential area characterised by
the presence of a range of dwellings, including detached, terraced and semi-
detached dwellings and dwellings of one and two storeys in height. Many
dwellings along Iveshead Road tend to be set relatively close to the road, some
behind gardens/parking areas and dwellings tend to have longer gardens to the
rear.
7. The appeal property has a long, L-shaped garden to the rear. Towards the end,
this garden runs alongside the short rear gardens of two storey terraced
dwellings along Abbey Close and close to the rear garden of a two storey
detached dwelling along that same street.
8. The detached garage with office space referred to above is located towards the
end where the rear garden widens out into its L-shape. As noted above, the
development appears largely complete. It comprises a relatively large structure
and the office element is set at first floor level and has north facing dormers.
The windows the subject of condition 3 are set within these dormers and face
directly towards the rear of the aforementioned dwellings along Abbey Close.
9. During my site visit I observed that, whilst there is some planting along the
appeal property’s boundary with the rear gardens of the dwellings along Abbey
Close, the windows the subject of condition 3 still provide potential for the
overlooking of gardens, especially when trees are not in full leaf, and for direct
views towards the rear windows of these dwellings.
10.Taking this together with the relatively close distance between the dormers and
the properties along Abbey Close into account, I find that these north facing
first floor windows have a detrimental impact on the privacy of the occupiers of
dwellings along Abbey Close.
11.The harm arising from this is exacerbated by the overall scale and height of the
garage with office space, such that its dormer windows appear prominently, as
dominant features located in a commanding position, when observed from the
direction of these dwellings.
12.Taking all of the above into account, I find that the removal of condition 3
would harm the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with regards to
privacy, contrary to the Framework, to Core Strategy1 Policy CS2; to Local Plan2
Policy DS5; and to the Council’s Design Supplementary Planning Document
(2020), which together amongst other things, seek to protect residential
amenity.
1 Reference: Charnwood Local Plan 2011 to 2028 Core Strategy (2015).
2 Reference: Charnwood Local Plan 1991-2006 (2004).
Appeal Decision APP/X2410/D/23/3322346
3
Conclusion
13.For the reasons given above, the appeal does not succeed.
N McGurk
INSPECTOR
Expert Representation
Don't leave your appeal to chance.
Inspectors are inconsistent. We build a technical defense using precedents from our 182,000+ case archive.
No win, no fee Householder representation — you only pay if you win.