Erection of an ancillary outbuilding (partially retrospective)
📊
See the success rate & inspector analytics
Free to view — just create an account, no payment needed.
Sign Up FreeTechnical Issues Heatmap
Character & Appearance
Heritage & Conservation
Policy Weight
Inspector’s Reasoning
Appeal Decision
Site visit made on 16 August 2023
by A Wright BSc (Hons) MRTPI
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State
Decision date: 30 August 2023
Appeal Ref: APP/U2235/D/22/3310565
Pollyfields Farm, The Barn, Scragged Oak Road, Detling, Kent ME14 3HL
• The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
against a refusal to grant planning permission.
• The appeal is made by Mr Paul Thomas against the decision of Maidstone Borough
Council.
• The application Ref 22/503351/FULL, dated 6 July 2022, was refused by notice dated
12 September 2022.
• The development proposed is the erection of an ancillary outbuilding (partially
retrospective).
Decision
1. The appeal is dismissed.
Preliminary Matters
2. I have used the description from the appeal form and decision notice in the
banner heading above. This is different from what was originally applied for,
but the parties agreed to change the description of the development during the
Council’s consideration of the application.
3. Planning permission was previously granted for a 3 bay garage (ref
19/506427/FULL) and I have had regard to this in my decision. However, it
was not implemented in accordance with the approved plans and the current
proposal would involve changes to the unauthorised building. I have
determined the appeal on the basis of the submitted plans.
4. The Council’s Draft Local Plan has been submitted and the examination process
is continuing. Given this, I attach limited weight to the new Local Plan’s
emerging policies and shall consider the appeal on that basis.
Main Issue
5. The main issue is the effect of the development on the character and
appearance of the area, having particular regard to conserving and enhancing
the landscape and scenic beauty of the Kent Downs Area of Outstanding
Natural Beauty (AONB).
Reasons
6. The site comprises a traditional barn and agricultural building converted to
residential use facing Scragged Oak Road approximately 80-90m away. There
is a large gravel parking area in front of the buildings, beyond which are
paddocks with a public footway running through the eastern part of the site. To
the south are the buildings of Pollyfields Farm which operates as a stables and
livery with paddocks between them and Scragged Oak Road to the east and
Appeal Decision APP/U2235/D/22/3310565
2
Hermitage Lane to the south. The grade II listed Pollyfields Manor lies to the
north.
7. The site is within the AONB where great weight should be given to conserving
the landscape and scenic beauty in accordance with the National Planning
Policy Framework (the Framework). The AONB is characterised by its dramatic
south-facing scarp, far-reaching views, secluded dry valleys, network of tiny
lanes, isolated farmsteads, churches and oasts, orchards, dramatic cliffs,
ancient woodlands and chalk grassland, and its ancient, remote and tranquil
qualities. As part of an isolated farmstead accessed from a narrow country
lane, the site makes a positive contribution to the landscape and scenic beauty
of the AONB.
8. The proposal would result in an outbuilding with a false-pitched roof,
incorporating one rooflight on the west facing slope and two in the flat top
section of the roof. Although the proposed materials would be appropriate in
this rural context and the height would be acceptable, lower than the garage
previously approved, its roof form would be significantly different to the
approved scheme. The development would have the same footprint and
position as the previously approved garage, located close to and subservient to
the existing buildings which would form a backdrop to it, but the introduction of
a large flat top roof would fail to reflect the prevailing hipped and pitched roof
design of the buildings in the farm complex. It would result in a discordant
addition in this traditional group of buildings.
9. The structure would not be located forward of Pollyfields Manor, but it would be
sited in front of the host dwelling. Whilst garage outbuildings are not
uncommon features associated with residential uses, and some landscaping is
proposed, the development would be clearly visible from the public footpath to
the east, from gaps in the planting along Scragged Oak Road and in more
distant glimpses from Hermitage Lane. Although it would not be more visible
than the approved garage, the ungainly false pitched, flat top roof design of the
building would be incongruous in public views of the farm complex.
10. My site visit was during the daytime, and I was unable to observe the night
skies in this part of the AONB. There are no streetlights along the nearby lanes,
but artificial light will already emanate from windows in the existing dwellings
at night times. The Council is concerned about upward glare and light spillage
from the two proposed rooflights on top of the flat section of the roof.
However, I have limited evidence that the light emanating from these would
have a greater impact than the light spill from existing buildings in the complex
or adversely affect the night skies in this location. Therefore, I find no harm in
this respect and no conflict with principle SD7 of the AONB Management Plan
which seeks to conserve dark night skies.
11. Overall, I conclude that the proposal would harm the character and appearance
of the area, having particular regard to conserving and enhancing the
landscape and scenic beauty of the AONB. This would be contrary to Policies
SP17, DM1, DM30 and DM32 of the Maidstone Borough Local Plan 2017.
Together, these give great weight to the conservation and enhancement of the
Kent Downs AONB, requiring development to respond to the natural character
and landscape value, maintain local distinctiveness and be unobtrusively
located. The proposal would also conflict with the Framework where it seeks to
Appeal Decision APP/U2235/D/22/3310565
3
protect and enhance valued landscapes and where it states that development
that is not well designed should be refused.
12. The proposal would also be contrary to principles SD1, SD2, SD3, SD8, SD9
and LLC1 of the Kent Downs AONB Management Plan 2021-2026. Together
these seek to ensure that the AONB landscape including its local character,
qualities and distinctiveness are conserved and enhanced. It would also conflict
with the Council’s Residential Extensions Supplementary Planning Document
2009 where it states that garages and outbuildings should not have a
detrimental impact on the character of the countryside by virtue of their form.
Other Matters
13. The site lies in proximity to the grade II listed Pollyfields Manor. I agree with
the Council that the degree of separation between the proposed building and
this heritage asset means that the proposal would not harm its significance.
Therefore, this is a neutral factor in the planning balance.
14. The appellant’s general dissatisfaction with their interactions with the Council
during the application process is a matter between those parties and it cannot
have any bearing on my determination of this appeal.
Conclusion
15. For the reasons given above, having regard to the development plan as a
whole, the Framework and all other relevant material considerations, I
conclude that the appeal should be dismissed.
A Wright BSc (Hons) MRTPI
INSPECTOR
Expert Representation
Don't leave your appeal to chance.
Inspectors are inconsistent. We build a technical defense using precedents from our 182,000+ case archive.
No win, no fee Householder representation — you only pay if you win.