I wish to increase the height of my current boundary wall to a maximum of 7 foot. I would like to have 7 foot pillars with 4 foot wall and 2 foot fence on top of the 4 foot wall. This will cover the front of my property
📊
See the success rate & inspector analytics
Free to view — just create an account, no payment needed.
Sign Up FreeTechnical Issues Heatmap
Character & Appearance
Policy Weight
Inspector’s Reasoning
Appeal Decision
Site visit made on 9 December 2022
by C Megginson BA (Hons) DipTP MRTPI
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State
Decision date: 21st December 2022
Appeal Ref: APP/N2739/D/22/3309079
1A Sandfield Terrace, Tadcaster, North Yorkshire LS24 8AW
• The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
against a refusal to grant planning permission.
• The appeal is made by Mrs Amy Heald against the decision of Selby District Council.
• The application Ref 2022/0860/HPA, dated 16 July 2022, was refused by notice dated
10 October 2022.
• The development proposed is described as I wish to increase the height of my current
boundary wall to a maximum of 7 foot. I would like to have 7 foot pillars with 4 foot
wall and 2 foot fence on top of the 4 foot wall. This will cover the front of my property.
Decision
1. The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for, I wish to increase
the height of my current boundary wall to a maximum of 7 foot. I would like to
have 7 foot pillars with 4 foot wall and 2 foot fence on top of the 4 foot wall.
This will cover the front of my property at 1A Sandfield Terrace, Tadcaster,
North Yorkshire LS24 8AW in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref
2022/0860/HPA, dated 16 July 2022, subject to the following conditions
1) The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years
from the date of this decision.
2) The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance
with the following approved plans: LOC01 1a sandfield terrace location
plan. Drg No HST/01 Proposed New Boundary Wall Details.
Main Issue
2. The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of
the area.
Reasons
3. The appeal site is a semidetached dwelling which sits in a prominent position
on Sandfield Terrace, close to the junction with York Road. The adjoining
dwelling has a high, solid fence along its front boundary and the immediate
area is characterised by high boundary fences, walls and hedges. The appeal
site faces onto an area of garage blocks and the rear of a terrace which also
features high, solid boundaries.
4. The appeal proposal would include a wall with pillars and fence panels on top,
set between the pillars. During my visit I noted a similar boundary design
under construction on the corner of Sandfield Terrace and York Road. In
addition, the appeal scheme would reflect the high solid boundary of the
adjacent property and those of surrounding dwellings and as a result would not
Appeal Decision APP/N2739/D/22/3309079
2
unacceptably harm the character and appearance of the area. As such it would
comply with Policies ENV1 of the Selby District Local Plan (2005) and Policy
SP19 of the Selby District Core Strategy Local Plan (2013) which seek to
ensure high quality design which reinforces local distinctiveness.
Conditions
5. I have imposed standard conditions relating to the commencement of
development and the approved plans in the interests of certainty.
Conclusion
6. The appeal scheme complies with the development plan, the appeal should
therefore be allowed.
C Megginson
INSPECTOR
Expert Representation
Don't leave your appeal to chance.
Inspectors are inconsistent. We build a technical defense using precedents from our 182,000+ case archive.
No win, no fee Householder representation — you only pay if you win.