Detached garage
📊
See the success rate & inspector analytics
Free to view — just create an account, no payment needed.
Sign Up FreeTechnical Issues Heatmap
Character & Appearance
Trees & Landscape
Inspector’s Reasoning
www.planningportal.gov.uk/planninginspectorate
Appeal Decision
Site visit made on 15 October 2018
by David Fitzsimon MRTPI
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State
Decision date: 26th October 2018
Appeal Ref: APP/R0660/D/18/3210604
58 Gawsworth Road, Macclesfield, Cheshire SK11 8UF
The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against
a refusal to grant planning permission.
The appeal is made by Mr Bob Cadman against the decision of Cheshire East Council.
The application Ref 18/3107M, dated 19 June 2018, was refused by notice dated
14 August 2018.
The development proposed is a detached garage.
Decision
1. The appeal is dismissed.
Main Issue
2. The main issue in this case is the effect of the proposed detached garage on the
character and appearance of the street scene.
Reasons
3. The dwellings within this part of Gawsworth Road are varied in terms of their
designs and styles, and they are generally set a comfortable distance from the
highway. This is a noticeable element which makes positive contribution to the
overall character and appearance of the street scene.
4. The proposal seeks to build a detached garage in front of the appeal dwelling
quite close to the highway. A mature hedge defines the boundary with the
highway along with a couple of cherry trees. However, the roof of the garage
would clearly visible above the hedge and part of the garage would be visible
from the wide vehicular entrance to the property.
5. Whilst the design and external finishing materials of the garage are acceptable,
its positioning would be at odds with the general pattern and arrangement of
development within this part of Gawsworth Road. As a result, it would appear
overly prominent and detrimental to the overall character and appearance of
the street scene.
6. The appellant has referred to other examples of garages which sit forward of
their respective dwellings within the locality, but these are very much the
exception rather than the rule. Further, I do not know the precise planning
circumstances behind them and I have considered the proposed garage against
Appeal Decision Ref: APP/R0660/D/18/3210604
2
the character and appearance of the particular part of Gawsworth Road within
which it would sit.
7. The appellant also refers to the size guidelines outlined on the Planning Portal
for detached domestic outbuildings. Whilst I note that the garage would be
comfortably below 4 metres in height, planning permission is required because
it sits in front of the dwelling, closer to the highway.
8. The appellant also suggests that a bus could be parked in the position of the
proposed garage, in the same way as a bus is parked in the forecourt of a
dwelling further along Gasworth Road. Whilst this may be so, it would not be a
permanent structure and it is beyond my control. I therefore give little weight
to this argument.
9. For the above reasons, and despite an absence of formal objections from third
parties, I conclude that the detached garage proposed would harm the
character and appearance of the street scene. In such terms, it conflicts with
policy SD2 of the adopted Cheshire East Local Plan Strategy, which seeks to
ensure that development contributes positively to an area’s character and
identity.
10. Accordingly, the appeal does not succeed.
David Fitzsimon
INSPECTOR
Expert Representation
Don't leave your appeal to chance.
Inspectors are inconsistent. We build a technical defense using precedents from our 182,000+ case archive.
No win, no fee Householder representation — you only pay if you win.