(i) A 2.75m high single storey rear extension projecting 3m; (ii) a two storey rear extension sited more than 2m from side boundary and 7m from rear boundary; (iii) a hip to gable extension with dormer extension (providing less than 50m3 additional volume); and (iv) rooflights and windows projecting less than 150mm from the roof slope
📊
Borough Success Rate
In Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council, approx 42.3% of Householder developments appeals are successful. (Sample: 799 cases).
Planzo Professional Representation
Don't leave your appeal to chance.
Inspectors are inconsistent. We build a technical defense using precedents from our 182,000 archive.
Fixed-fee Householder representation for £750.
Technical Issues Heatmap
Instant scan of technical battlegrounds available with a Day Pass.
Inspector Profile: Moss J
Archive Data: 36 Decisions
Allowance Rate (Householder developments)
36.1%
↑ High
National Average (Householder developments)
35.3%
Inspector's Analysis
https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate
Appeal Decision
No Site Visit
by J Moss BSc (Hons) DipTP MRTPI
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State
Decision date: 19 July 2022
Appeal Ref: APP/L5810/X/21/3285999
Land at 47 Fielding Avenue, Twickenham TW2 5LZ
• The appeal is made under section 195 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as
amended against a refusal to gra…