Alterations to roof, including dormers
📊
See the success rate & inspector analytics
Free to view — just create an account, no payment needed.
Sign Up FreeTechnical Issues Heatmap
Extensions
Heritage & Conservation
Residential Amenity
Inspector’s Reasoning
Appeal Decision
Site Visit made on 18 October 2021
by James Blackwell LLB (Hons) PgDip
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State
Decision date: 28 October 2021
Appeal Ref: APP/K1128/D/21/3279232
Lealholme, Allenhayes Road, Salcombe TQ8 8HU
• The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
against a refusal to grant planning permission.
• The appeal is made by Mr & Mrs Maltby against the decision of South Hams District
Council.
• The application Ref 0385/21/HHO, dated 1 February 2021, was refused by notice dated
29 April 2021.
• The development proposed is alterations to roof, including dormers.
Decision
1. The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for alterations to roof,
including dormers at Lealholme, Allenhayes Road, Salcombe TQ8 8HU in
accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 0385/21/HHO, dated 1
February 2021, subject to the following conditions:
1) The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years
from the date of this decision.
2) The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance
with the following approved drawings: Site Location Plan (3738.10 Rev
A); Block Plan (3738.11); Proposed Drawings (3738.20 Rev C); and
Proposed Roof Plan (3738.30 Rev C).
3) The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of
the development shall match those used in the existing building.
Preliminary Matters
2. Since determination of the planning application, the 2019 iteration of the
National Planning Policy Framework (Framework) has been superseded. I am
satisfied that the updates to the Framework do not materially affect its content
insofar as it is relevant to the main issue of this appeal, so I have therefore
determined this appeal with regard to the current version, published in July
2021.
Main Issue
3. The main issue is whether the proposed development would preserve or
enhance the character or appearance of the conservation area.
Reasons
4. The appeal property, which is a detached two-storey period dwelling, is located
on Allenhayes Road, which is within both the Salcombe Conservation Area (CA)
and the Salcombe Devon Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB). The
Salcombe Conservation Area Appraisal designates the road within the
Appeal Decision APP/K1128/D/21/3279232
2
“Victorian Suburbs and Outer Environs” character area, which is characterised
by “tall Victorian villas [which] dominate the skyline clearly visible from within
the main streets and from the water”. The majority have been built in pairs but
groups of three and longer terraces exist in Allenhayes and Devon Road
respectively”. This description is commensurate with the physical
characteristics of properties within the immediate vicinity of the appeal
property, which are generally typified by their large size, pitched roofs, front
gables, and elevated position from the road.
5. The appeal property itself currently has a hipped roof. The proposed
development would extend the existing ridge line to create a pitched roof,
incorporating gable ends to each side of the dwelling. Neither the footprint, nor
the overall ridge height of the property would change. Given that the
overarching roof design would be consistent in appearance with the roofs of
several close neighbouring properties, these changes would integrate properly
with the prevailing pattern of development in the area, thereby preserving the
key characteristics of the CA.
6. The new roof would incorporate a central rooflight, together with two pitched
roof dormers along the front roof-slope. To the rear, a larger pitch-roofed
dormer would also be installed. The front dormers are modest in size, and
would be proportionate to the overall size of the roof slope. They would be
sufficiently inset from each side and below the roof ridge, to ensure they would
not appear dominant. They would also align with the fenestration at both
ground and first floor level, which ensures the balance and symmetry of the
property’s frontage would be retained. Given that dormers are already a
common feature of properties along Allenhayes Road, the proposed changes
would also reflect the pattern of development in the area, and therefore be in-
keeping with the appearance of the street scene.
7. As the rear dormer would be sited in the middle of the roof plane, it would not
be visible along Allenhayes Road, and so would not impact on the street scene.
In terms of the properties behind the appeal dwelling, the steep sloping
topography of land in the area means that the natural seaward views from
these properties look out over (and above) the appeal property, as opposed to
down on to it, which means the dormer would not interrupt nor interfere with
their outlook.
8. For these reasons, I am satisfied that the proposed development would
preserve the character and appearance of the conservation area. It would be
consistent with Policies SPT11, DEV20 and DEV21 of the Plymouth & South
West Devon Joint Local Plan (2014 – 2034) and Policy SALC B1 of the
Salcombe Neighbourhood Plan (2018 0 2034), all of which seek to ensure that
new development achieves high quality design which preserves the historic
environment, and which responds properly to the prevailing character of
development in the area. The development would also be consistent with the
overarching design objectives of the Framework. For the same reasons, and in
accordance with my duty under section 85(1) of the Countryside and Rights of
Way Act 2000, I am satisfied that the proposed development would conserve
the natural beauty of the South Devon AONB.
Other Matters
9. In terms of scale, and notwithstanding the additional storey incorporated into
the roof space, the development would not change the overall footprint of the
Appeal Decision APP/K1128/D/21/3279232
3
appeal dwelling, not its height. As such, the increased space afforded from the
extended ridge line would not alter the character of the property in such a way
as to appear excessive or dominant.
10. Given the sloping topography of land in this area, there will invariably be a
degree of overlooking between closely sited dwellings, particularly where more
elevated properties look down over properties in front. This is common to the
properties along Allenhayes Road. In this instance, whilst the new dormers
would face Combehaven opposite, given the elevated position of Lealholme, the
dormers would look out over the Combehaven below, rather than down on to
it. Moreover, given the modest size of the dormers and the ample separation
distance between the two properties, any remote risk of overlooking would not
be at an unacceptable level.
11. Whilst I note the parking concerns raised, the additional floorspace afforded by
the roof alterations is unlikely to make any meaningful difference to parking
demand for the property, and so this factor only carries limited weight in my
decision.
Conditions
12. I have included a plans condition to ensure certainty over the development
permitted. I have also included a condition requiring the external materials to
match those of the existing dwelling to ensure the development integrates
seamlessly with the original property.
Conclusion
13. For the reasons given above, and having considered the development plan as a
whole, the approach in the Framework (2021), and all other relevant material
considerations, the appeal should be allowed.
James Blackwell
INSPECTOR
Expert Representation
Don't leave your appeal to chance.
Inspectors are inconsistent. We build a technical defense using precedents from our 182,000+ case archive.
No win, no fee Householder representation — you only pay if you win.