Appeal Against Conditions
📊
See the success rate & inspector analytics
Free to view — just create an account, no payment needed.
Sign Up FreeTechnical Issues Heatmap
Extensions
Inspector’s Reasoning
Appeal Decision
Site Visit made on 5 July 2021
by M Bale BA (Hons) MA MRTPI
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State
Decision date: 19 July 2021
Appeal Ref: APP/X1165/D/21/3271860
14 Cliff Road, Paignton TQ4 6DG
• The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
against a refusal to grant planning permission under section 73 of the Town and
Country Planning Act 1990 for the development of land without complying with
conditions subject to which a previous planning permission was granted.
• The appeal is made by Mr Gary Bishop against the decision of Torbay Council.
• The application Ref P/2020/0793, dated 10 August 2020, was refused by notice dated
28 January 2021.
• The application sought planning permission for dormer oft [sic.] conversion;
replacement garage and rear extension without complying with a condition attached to
planning permission Ref P/2008/1343/PA, dated 14 November 2008.
Decision
1. The appeal is dismissed.
Procedural Matter
2. The appeal relates to a proposal under S73 of the Town and Country Planning
Act 1990. Such is a proposal to carry out development without complying with
a condition, subject to which a previous planning permission was granted.
3. In essence, the proposal seeks to carry out development pursuant to a
different set of plans to those originally permitted by the Council. I understand
that the Council advised the appellant how to proceed and, indeed, S73 is often
used in this way. However, the process requires a condition listing the
approved plans and, while plans are stated on the Decision Notice for
information, the original planning permission in this case contains no such
condition. There is, therefore, no proposal under S73 before me.
4. Accordingly, I have considered the matter no further and the appeal is
dismissed.
M Bale
INSPECTOR
Expert Representation
Don't leave your appeal to chance.
Inspectors are inconsistent. We build a technical defense using precedents from our 182,000+ case archive.
No win, no fee Householder representation — you only pay if you win.