Appeal Against Conditions

📊

See the success rate & inspector analytics

Free to view — just create an account, no payment needed.

Sign Up Free

Technical Issues Heatmap

Extensions

Inspector’s Reasoning

Appeal Decision Site Visit made on 5 July 2021 by M Bale BA (Hons) MA MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 19 July 2021 Appeal Ref: APP/X1165/D/21/3271860 14 Cliff Road, Paignton TQ4 6DG • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission under section 73 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 for the development of land without complying with conditions subject to which a previous planning permission was granted. • The appeal is made by Mr Gary Bishop against the decision of Torbay Council. • The application Ref P/2020/0793, dated 10 August 2020, was refused by notice dated 28 January 2021. • The application sought planning permission for dormer oft [sic.] conversion; replacement garage and rear extension without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref P/2008/1343/PA, dated 14 November 2008. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Procedural Matter 2. The appeal relates to a proposal under S73 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. Such is a proposal to carry out development without complying with a condition, subject to which a previous planning permission was granted. 3. In essence, the proposal seeks to carry out development pursuant to a different set of plans to those originally permitted by the Council. I understand that the Council advised the appellant how to proceed and, indeed, S73 is often used in this way. However, the process requires a condition listing the approved plans and, while plans are stated on the Decision Notice for information, the original planning permission in this case contains no such condition. There is, therefore, no proposal under S73 before me. 4. Accordingly, I have considered the matter no further and the appeal is dismissed. M Bale INSPECTOR
Expert Representation

Don't leave your appeal to chance.

Inspectors are inconsistent. We build a technical defense using precedents from our 182,000+ case archive.
No win, no fee Householder representation — you only pay if you win.

Get Free Review How it works →