Without planning permission, the unauthorised erection of a boundary fence structure in excess of parameters of permitted development rights within The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 Schedule 2 Part 2 Class A (outlined in blue on attached plan for identification purposes only), along with the erection of a canopy made of recycled plastic to the side of the premises not in accordance with permitted
📊
Borough Success Rate
In Cambridge City Council, approx 23.7% of Householder developments appeals are successful. (Sample: 93 cases).
Planzo Professional Representation
Don't leave your appeal to chance.
Inspectors are inconsistent. We build a technical defense using precedents from our 182,000 archive.
Fixed-fee Householder representation for £750.
Technical Issues Heatmap
Instant scan of technical battlegrounds available with a Day Pass.
Inspector Profile: Dyer S
Archive Data: 44 Decisions
Allowance Rate (Householder developments)
22.7%
↓ Strict
National Average (Householder developments)
35.3%
Inspector's Analysis
https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate
Appeal Decision
Site Visit made on 21 September 2021
by Sarah Dyer BA BTP MRTPI MCMI
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State
Decision date: 8 October 2021
Appeal Ref: APP/Q0505/C/21/3270383
107 Argyle Street, Cambridge, CB1 3LS
• The appeal is made under section 174 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as
amended. The appe…