Without planning permission, the unauthorised erection of a single storey front extension (outlined in yellow on attached plans for identification purposes only), a part single storey, part two-storey rear extension (outlined in green on attached plans for identification purposes only) and a first floor side extension (outlined in blue on attached plans for identification purposes only) at the Land
📊
Borough Success Rate
In Cambridge City Council, approx 23.7% of Householder developments appeals are successful. (Sample: 93 cases).
Planzo Professional Representation
Don't leave your appeal to chance.
Inspectors are inconsistent. We build a technical defense using precedents from our 182,000 archive.
Fixed-fee Householder representation for £750.
Technical Issues Heatmap
Instant scan of technical battlegrounds available with a Day Pass.
Inspector Profile: Stephens K
Archive Data: 82 Decisions
Allowance Rate (Householder developments)
22.0%
↓ Strict
National Average (Householder developments)
35.3%
Inspector's Analysis
https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate
Appeal Decision
Site visit made on 15 June 2021
by K Stephens BSc (Hons) MTP MRTPI
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State
Decision date: 28 June 2021
Appeal Ref: APP/Q0505/C/20/3259688
Land at 29 Fernlea Close, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire CB1 9LW
• The appeal is made under section 174 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as …