It is considered that the development has not been built in accordance with approved plans reference 17/00629/FULH which was for the following description: "Two storey front and side extension, front porch extension and 2 no dormer windows to the front elevation. Single storey rear extension and velux rooflights to rear main roof slope. Conversion existing outbuilding within rear garden to sunroom/gym (Revised description/amended plan
📊
Borough Success Rate
In North Tyneside Council, approx 27.1% of Householder developments appeals are successful. (Sample: 70 cases).
Planzo Professional Representation
Don't leave your appeal to chance.
Inspectors are inconsistent. We build a technical defense using precedents from our 182,000 archive.
Fixed-fee Householder representation for £750.
Technical Issues Heatmap
Instant scan of technical battlegrounds available with a Day Pass.
Inspector Profile: Gray E
Archive Data: 139 Decisions
Allowance Rate (Householder developments)
25.2%
↓ Strict
National Average (Householder developments)
35.3%
Inspector's Analysis
https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate
Appeal Decisions
Site visit made on 2 February 2021
by Elaine Gray MA(Hons) MSc IHBC
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State
Decision date: 7 May 2021
Appeal A - Ref: APP/W4515/C/20/3258454
2 West Lane, Killingworth, Tyne and Wear, NE12 7BD
• The appeal is made under section 174 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as
amend…