Conversion of existing garage to form annex and erection of detached garage
📊
See the success rate & inspector analytics
Free to view — just create an account, no payment needed.
Sign Up FreeTechnical Issues Heatmap
Character & Appearance
Trees & Landscape
Conversion/Use
Inspector’s Reasoning
Appeal Decision
Site visit made on 1 February 2018
by D Guiver LLB(Hons) Solicitor
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State
Decision date: 28 February 2018
Appeal Ref: APP/E2734/D/17/3188907
Owl Barn, The Knott, Pateley Bridge, Harrogate, North Yorkshire HG3 5HN
The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
against a refusal to grant planning permission.
The appeal is made by Mr Tony Pickering against the decision of Harrogate Borough
Council.
The application Ref 17/03699/FUL, dated 8 August 2017, was refused by notice dated
26 October 2017.
The development proposed is conversion of existing garage to form annex and erection
of detached garage.
Decision
1. The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for conversion of
existing garage to form annex and erection of detached garage at Owl Barn,
The Knott, Pateley Bridge, Harrogate, North Yorkshire HG3 5HN in accordance
with the terms of the application, Ref 17/03699/FUL, dated 8 August 2017,
subject to the following conditions:
1) The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than three years
from the date of this decision.
2) The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance
with the following approved plans: 4083 and 4187.The external surfaces
of the development hereby permitted shall be constructed in materials to
match those in the existing building.
3) All doors and windows in the development hereby permitted shall be
recessed to form reveals to match those in the existing building.
4) The use of the detached garage hereby permitted shall be incidental to
the residential use, and shall remain within the curtilage of, the existing
building and shall not be let or used other than by the occupiers of the
existing building and members of their household.
5) All the trees and hedges shown on the drawing no. 4187 marked
"Existing mature trees/planting" and any trees whose canopies overhang
the site shall be protected by strong fencing, the location and type to be
previously approved in writing by the local planning authority. The
fencing shall be erected in accordance with the approved details before
any equipment, machinery or materials are brought onto the site for the
purposes of the development, and shall be maintained until all
equipment, machinery and surplus materials have been removed from
the site. Nothing shall be stored or placed within any fenced area, and
Appeal Decision APP/E2734/D/17/3188907
2
the ground levels within those areas shall not be altered, nor shall any
excavation be made, without the prior written consent of the local
planning authority.
Main Issue
2. The main issue is the effect of the proposed development on the character and
appearance of the host building and on the Nidderdale Area of Outstanding
Natural Beauty.
Reasons
Character and Appearance
3. The appeal site comprises a dwelling and garage converted from former
agricultural buildings in a largely open plot of land located in a small cluster of
similar developments. The garage is attached to the main part of the building
that comprises the dwelling but a portion is within the curtilage of the
neighbouring Knott House Farm. From observations at my site visit it appeared
that the garage element of the building retains much of its original stone
structure and slate roof. However, the entrance to the garage is through
relatively large, white-painted metal doors that contrast markedly with the
sympathetic treatment of the remainder of the building that alludes to the
agricultural origins of the site.
4. The proposal would entail the replacement of the metal doors with glazing that
in my opinion would be more responsive to the agricultural origins and the
character of building as a whole and would result in an overall enhancement of
the appearance. The proposal would also result in a detached structure to
replace the space lost to the incorporation of the existing garage into the
dwelling. This structure would be relatively close to the main building and
would be adjacent to an existing stone wall and roughly in line with an existing
building on the other side of the wall. The detached garage would be
constructed in stone and slate to match the existing buildings and all windows
and doors would be constructed in timber. In my opinion the proposed garage
structure would not have a detrimental effect on the character and appearance
of the existing building. The materials and design of the proposal would be
similar in appearance to a small agricultural outbuilding in keeping with the
origins of the other buildings on site.
5. Consequently the proposal would accord with Saved Policies H15 and HD20 of
the Harrogate District Local Plan 2001 (the Local Plan), which together seek to
ensure that extensions and new buildings respect the character, appearance
and the local distinctiveness of existing buildings.
Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty
6. The appeal site sits within the Nidderdale Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty
(the AONB) which has the highest status of protection. In accordance with
paragraph 115 of the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework), the
conservation of the landscape and scenic beauty is a material consideration to
which I attach great weight. The AONB is characterised by a number of small
settlements and relatively remote farm buildings in a largely open countryside
of hills and valleys.
Appeal Decision APP/E2734/D/17/3188907
3
7. The existing dwelling and garage sits comfortably within the small cluster of
surrounding buildings and reflects the previous agricultural use. Overall the
site preserves the character and appearance of the AONB. In my opinion, the
proposed alterations to the existing garage and the replacement of the white-
painted metal doors with more sympathetic timber windows would enhance the
buildings contribution to the AONB. The design of the proposed detached
garage and the materials specified for construction would be in keeping with
the buildings characteristic to the area. I consider that the relatively small size
of the proposed garage would not result in an incongruous addition to the
AONB and would not have a detrimental effect on its appearance.
8. Consequently the proposal would accord with Policies EQ2, SG3 and SG4 of the
Harrogate District Local Development Framework Core Strategy 2009 and
Saved Policies C1, C2, C16 and H15 of the Local Plan, which together seek to
ensure that developments protect and enhance the character and appearance
of the landscape and avoid significant adverse impacts on the AONB.
Conditions
9. The conditions set out in the accompanying schedule are based on those
suggested by the Council. Where necessary I have amended the wording of
these in the interests of precision and clarity in order to comply with the advice
in the Planning Practice Guidance.
10. In the interests of proper planning I have imposed the standard condition in
respect of time limits. For certainty I have imposed a condition requiring
compliance with the plans. To protect the character and appearance of the
area I have imposed conditions requiring external surfaces of the development
to be constructed in materials to match those in the existing building as
specified in the application for planning permission and for all windows and
doors to be recessed to form matching reveals. The materials are readily
identifiable and therefore I have not imposed a condition requiring the
submission of samples to the Council prior to development.
11. In the interests of controlling development I have imposed a condition
requiring the detached garage to remain within the curtilage of the existing
building for use only by its occupiers and members of their household. In the
interests of preserving trees on and adjacent to the site, including those that
might be subject to a Tree Preservation Order, I have imposed conditions to
protect them during development.
Conclusion
12. For the reasons given above, and taking into account all other matters, I
therefore conclude that the appeal should succeed.
D Guiver
INSPECTOR
Expert Representation
Don't leave your appeal to chance.
Inspectors are inconsistent. We build a technical defense using precedents from our 182,000+ case archive.
No win, no fee Householder representation — you only pay if you win.