First floor side extension
📊
See the success rate & inspector analytics
Free to view — just create an account, no payment needed.
Sign Up FreeTechnical Issues Heatmap
Heritage & Conservation
Extensions
Character & Appearance
Inspector’s Reasoning
Appeal Decision
Site visit made on 9 January 2018
by Rory MacLeod BA MRTPI
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State
Decision date: 08 February 2018
Appeal Ref: APP/C1950/D/17/3184091
1 Longcroft Lane, Welwyn Garden City AL8 6EB
The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
against a refusal to grant planning permission.
The appeal is made by Mr and Mrs Paul and Jenny Stringer against the decision of
Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council.
The application Ref 6/2017/0725/HOUSE, dated 9 April 2017, was refused by notice
dated 22 June 2017.
The development proposed is first floor side extension.
Decision
1. The appeal is allowed. Planning permission is granted for a first floor side
extension at 1 Longcroft Lane, Welwyn Garden City AL8 6EB, in accordance
with the terms of the application, Ref 6/2017/0725/HOUSE, dated 9 April 2017,
subject to the following conditions:
1) The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years
from the date of this decision.
2) The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance
with the following approved plans: 100/2/PL001, 100/2/LP002,
100/2/PL03, Location Plan.
3) No development shall commence until samples of the materials to be
used in the construction of the external surfaces of the extension hereby
permitted have been submitted to and approved in writing by the local
planning authority. Development shall be carried out in accordance with
the approved samples.
Main Issue
2. The main issue is the effect of the development on the character and
appearance of the existing dwelling and on the Welwyn Garden City
Conservation Area.
Reasons
3. The appeal property is an attractive end of terrace two storey house
constructed of red bricks with a clay pantile roof. The houses in the terrace are
of differing design but the terrace has a symmetrical appearance with the outer
dwellings providing ‘book end’ features. The house is located towards the
northern end of Longcroft Lane, close to the town centre. The site and
surrounding area is within the Welwyn Garden City Conservation Area.
Appeal Decision APP/C1950/D/17/3184091
2
4. At the time of my site visit work was underway at the site to construct a single
storey side extension following a recent grant of planning permission. The
appeal proposal is for a first floor side extension over this. There would be a
pitched roof with a ridge height to match that of the existing dwelling. The
extension would be set in significantly from the front and rear walls resulting in
a subservient appearance. External materials and windows would match those
on the existing property.
5. Section 72(1) of the of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas)
Act 1990 imposes a statutory duty, in considering whether to grant planning
permission, that special attention shall be paid to the desirability of preserving
or enhancing the character or appearance of that area.
6. The Welwyn Garden City Conservation Area covers an extensive area of the
town centre and surrounding residential areas and contains areas of differing
character. The terraces and semi-detached houses in Longcroft Lane are
original dwellings and the design of the terrace including the appeal site is
replicated elsewhere in the road. The appeal building makes a positive
contribution to the character of the Conservation Area.
7. The proposed first floor extension would be of modest size, sympathetically
designed and a subservient feature. It would reflect the set back to the
adjacent house no.3 and would not undermine the ‘book end’ roles served by
no’s 1 and 11 at either end of the terrace. Whilst views of the extension would
be obscured by trees from some positions in Longcroft Lane, it would be a
prominent feature when viewed over the adjacent car park in Church Road to
the north of the site. Its subordinate nature and complementary design would
be apparent from this side view and from in front of the building. I have noted
the Council’s concerns that the original profile of the house would be lost and
that there are relatively few first floor side extensions in the vicinity, but the
proposal would nonetheless respect the architectural detailing on the existing
terrace and would have a satisfactory appearance in the street scene.
8. My findings are that the proposal would have a neutral effect on the Welwyn
Garden City Conservation Area and so would preserve its character and
appearance. As such it would satisfy the requirements of the special duty for
new development to preserve or enhance the character or appearance of
conservation areas.
9. The development would accord with Policies D1 and D2 of the Welwyn Hatfield
District Plan 2005 which require new developments to be of a high standard of
design and to respect and relate to the character and context of the area in
which it is proposed. There would be no conflict with the design and historic
environment provisions of the National Planning Policy Framework 2012.
Conclusion
10. For the reasons given, and having regard to all matters raised, the appeal is
allowed subject to conditions to limit the life of the permission, to list the plan
numbers for the avoidance of doubt and to obtain approval of external
materials to ensure a satisfactory appearance.
Rory MacLeod
INSPECTOR
Expert Representation
Don't leave your appeal to chance.
Inspectors are inconsistent. We build a technical defense using precedents from our 182,000+ case archive.
No win, no fee Householder representation — you only pay if you win.