Erection of a single-storey rear extension to a maximum depth of 4m (to a flush rear wall). This would ordinarily fall as a permitted development, however, as there is a small recess in the rear of the original build it creates a side elevation (albeit a tiny one) but nonetheless it means we cannot extend over half the width of the original house. On that basis this application is required
📊
Borough Success Rate
In London Borough of Enfield, approx 35.6% of Householder developments appeals are successful. (Sample: 741 cases).
Planzo Professional Representation
Don't leave your appeal to chance.
Inspectors are inconsistent. We build a technical defense using precedents from our 182,000 archive.
Fixed-fee Householder representation for £750.
Technical Issues Heatmap
Instant scan of technical battlegrounds available with a Day Pass.
Inspector Profile: Bell-Williamson JR
Archive Data: 224 Decisions
Allowance Rate (Householder developments)
44.2%
↑ High
National Average (Householder developments)
35.3%
Inspector's Analysis
https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate
Appeal Decision
Site visit made on 22 November 2017
by J Bell-Williamson MA MRTPI
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Decision date: 07 December 2017
Appeal Ref: APP/Q5300/D/17/3182867
25 Westpole Avenue, Enfield EN4 0AX
The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Pla…