Work proposed is described as ‘the erection of a wooden garden shed (single storey) with 4 windows one side. Sited behind garages not seen from ‘Woodside’. Not obstructing full view of front or side of house. Retrospective.’ ’ Decision
📊
Borough Success Rate
In Rutland County Council, approx 27.4% of Householder developments appeals are successful. (Sample: 73 cases).
Planzo Professional Representation
Don't leave your appeal to chance.
Inspectors are inconsistent. We build a technical defense using precedents from our 182,000 archive.
Fixed-fee Householder representation for £750.
Technical Issues Heatmap
Instant scan of technical battlegrounds available with a Day Pass.
Inspector Profile: Colebourne S
Archive Data: 257 Decisions
Allowance Rate (Householder developments)
33.5%
↓ Strict
National Average (Householder developments)
35.3%
Inspector's Analysis
Appeal Decision
Site visit made on 10 October 2017
by Sarah Colebourne MA, MRTPI
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Decision date: 20th October 2017
Appeal Ref: APP/A2470/D/17/3179383
6 Woodside, Ashwell, Oakham, Rutland, LE15 7LX
The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
against a refusal to gran…