Loft conversion
📊
See the success rate & inspector analytics
Free to view — just create an account, no payment needed.
Sign Up FreeTechnical Issues Heatmap
Extensions
Character & Appearance
Inspector’s Reasoning
Appeal Decision
Site visit made on 3 October 2017
by Siobhan Watson BA(Hons) MCD MRTPI
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Decision date: 9 October 2017
Appeal Ref: APP/N5090/D/17/3177214
25 Sphinx Way, Barnet, EN5 2FG
The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
against a refusal to grant planning permission.
The appeal is made by Mr Aron James against the decision of the Council of the London
Borough of Barnet.
The application Ref 17/1787/HSE, dated 21 March 2017, was refused by notice dated 16
May 2017.
The development proposed is a loft conversion.
Decision
1. The appeal is dismissed.
Main Issue
2. The main issue is the effect of the proposed dormer upon the character and
appearance of the area.
Reasons
3. The appeal property is a terraced house within a recently constructed housing
estate. The straight roof of the long terrace provides a distinct smooth edge to
the building which is prominent in public views from Hammond Close. The
proposed dormer would be deep, wide and bulky and would break the
continuous linear feature of the rear roof plane. It would be an obtrusive
feature on the building and within the wider street-scene.
4. The proposed dormer would therefore harm the character and appearance of
the area and would conflict with Policy 7.6 of the London Plan 2016; Policy CS1
and CS5 of Barnet’s Local Plan (Core Strategy), 2012; Policy DM01 of Barnet’s
Local Plan (Development Management Policies) 2012; and Barnet’s
Supplementary Planning Document: Residential Design Guidance, 2016. In
combination, these policies seek high standards of urban design and to protect
the character and appearance of the area.
5. I appreciate that the appellant has a growing family which puts pressure on
bedroom space. However, planning permission runs with the land rather than
with the applicant or appellant. Therefore, if the appeal were to be allowed, the
resultant dormer would be a permanent feature within the street-scene. I
therefore give the personal circumstances of the appellant limited weight.
6. The appeal is therefore dismissed.
Siobhan Watson INSPECTOR
Expert Representation
Don't leave your appeal to chance.
Inspectors are inconsistent. We build a technical defense using precedents from our 182,000+ case archive.
No win, no fee Householder representation — you only pay if you win.