Retrospective application re details of approved extensions here- to retain the as-built clay-tiled open front canopy over the as-approved entrance doorway; also, to retain the existing as-built white rendered first floor gable frontage here; small roof amendment to yet-to-be-built rear single storey extension, reducing volume and introducing small area of red clay tiled roof to one side elevation, to mirror the as-approved other side elevation here
📊
Borough Success Rate
In London Borough of Hillingdon, approx 46.8% of Householder developments appeals are successful. (Sample: 1203 cases).
Planzo Professional Representation
Don't leave your appeal to chance.
Inspectors are inconsistent. We build a technical defense using precedents from our 182,000 archive.
Fixed-fee Householder representation for £750.
Technical Issues Heatmap
Instant scan of technical battlegrounds available with a Day Pass.
Inspector Profile: Jackson R
Archive Data: 120 Decisions
Allowance Rate (Householder developments)
50.8%
↑ High
National Average (Householder developments)
35.3%
Inspector's Analysis
https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate
Appeal Decision
Site visit made on 20 June 2017
by R J Jackson BA MPhil DMS MRTPI MCMI
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Decision date: 06 July 2017
Appeal Ref: APP/R5510/D/17/3176314
104 Breakspear Road South, Ickenham UB10 8HF
The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country …