Addition of small pitched roof dormer window to rear of dwelling
📊
See the success rate & inspector analytics
Free to view — just create an account, no payment needed.
Sign Up FreeTechnical Issues Heatmap
Residential Amenity
Extensions
Character & Appearance
Inspector’s Reasoning
Appeal Decision
Site visit made on 30 May 2017
by David Walker MA MRTPI
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Decision date: 14th June 2017
Appeal Ref: APP/J9497/D/17/3173365
1 The Old School, New Street, Chagford, Newton Abbot TQ13 8BB
The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
against a refusal to grant planning permission.
The appeal is made by Mr Philip Herbert against the decision of Dartmoor National Park
Authority.
The application Ref 0632/16, dated 25 November 2016, was refused by notice dated
25 January 2017.
The development proposed is addition of small pitched roof dormer window to rear of
dwelling.
Decision
1. The appeal is dismissed.
Main Issue
2. The main issue in the appeal is the effect of the proposal on the living
conditions of the occupant of the adjoining property having regard to privacy.
Reasons
3. The small dormer window would be added to the roof of an existing ground
floor extension at the property. It is required to provide light to a small room
used as a store and overlooking of a private courtyard area. However, given
the close arrangement of the accommodation within the former school the
dormer window would be positioned where it could afford direct views into the
neighbour’s living room.
4. Under the existing use of the room as a store there would be a reasonable
expectation of reduced overlooking under normal use. However, it is indicated
that use of the room may change in which case increased overlooking would be
a likely outcome.
5. The proposal has been revised to reduce the size of the window and I
acknowledge that some mutual overlooking is a common occurrence within
densely built and historic areas. There would nonetheless remain a deleterious
effect on the levels of privacy experienced by the neighbour that would cause
significant harm to existing living conditions.
6. I am satisfied, however, having regard to the small scale of the proposal, that
it would have a neutral effect on the character and appearance of the Chagford
Conservation Area and on the natural beauty, wildlife and cultural heritage of
Appeal Decision APP/J9497/D/17/3173365
2
the National Park and opportunities for the understanding and enjoyment of its
special qualities by the public.
7. As there is little benefit demonstrated to outweigh the harm that would occur,
it would conflict with the aims of Policy DMD4 of the Dartmoor National Park
Authority Development Management and Delivery Development Plan Document
2013. The policy seeks to avoid development that would significantly reduce
the levels of privacy enjoyed by the occupiers of nearby properties, amongst
other things.
Conclusion
8. For the reasons given above I conclude that the appeal should be dismissed.
David Walker
INSPECTOR
Expert Representation
Don't leave your appeal to chance.
Inspectors are inconsistent. We build a technical defense using precedents from our 182,000+ case archive.
No win, no fee Householder representation — you only pay if you win.