Construction of first floor rear extension over existing single storey rear extension
📊
See the success rate & inspector analytics
Free to view — just create an account, no payment needed.
Sign Up FreeTechnical Issues Heatmap
Residential Amenity
Extensions
Character & Appearance
Inspector’s Reasoning
Appeal Decision
Site visit made on 16 May 2017
by Rachael A Bust BSc (Hons) MA MSc LLM MIEnvSci MInstLM MCMI MRTPI
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Decision date: 01 June 2017
Appeal Ref: APP/B0230/D/17/3172959
423 Dallow Road, Luton, Bedfordshire LU1 1UL
The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
against a refusal to grant planning permission.
The appeal is made by Mrs Fawzia Khanam against the decision of Luton Borough
Council.
The application Ref 16/01028/FUL, dated 10 June 2016, was refused by notice dated
8 February 2017.
The development proposed is the construction of first floor rear extension over existing
single storey rear extension.
Decision
1. The appeal is dismissed.
Main Issues
2. The main issues are the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance
of the host property and the surrounding area; and the living conditions of 421
Dallow Road with particular regard to outlook, light and overshadowing.
Reasons
Character and Appearance
3. The southern side of Dallow Road is predominantly residential in character with
commercial units to the north. The appeal property is the end of a terraced
group of 4 properties with rear gardens that are south facing, narrow and deep.
4. The appeal property has an existing single storey rear extension that is
approximately 5.2 metres deep and 4.2 metres wide with a pitched roof. It is
set in from the boundary with the adjoining property, No 421, by around 0.55
metres. There is no inset from the main house on the western elevation.
5. The proposed development would involve the addition of a first floor to the
existing rear extension. The first floor extension would not have the same
dimensions as the ground floor element. It would be approximately 4.5 metres
deep and 3.2 metres wide. The first floor extension would be positioned to
match the existing eastern side wall of the ground floor extension, as such
being inset from the boundary with No 421 by around 0.55 metres. On the
western side, closest to No 425, the first floor side wall would be inset by
approximately one metre from the side wall of the ground floor element. The
first floor extension would have a flat roof located just under the eaves of the
Appeal Decision APP/B0230/D/17/3172959
2
main house. It would add a total of 2.5 metres to the overall height and part
of the pitched roof to the existing ground floor would still remain.
6. I find that significant harm would arise from the combination of the two
extensions representing an incongruous addition to the rear elevation of
423 Dallow Road. The cumulative effect would not enable the combined
extension to be viewed as sufficiently subordinate to the main dwelling. The
scale and siting of the resultant addition would not be sufficiently sympathetic
to the character and appearance of the rear elevations of the surrounding
properties on Dallow Road. Consequently the proposed first floor extension
fails to satisfy the saved policies ENV9 and H4 of the Luton Local Plan, adopted
2006, which requires new development to respect the scale, proportions and
design of existing dwellings.
Living Conditions
7. No 421 is attached to the appeal property and it has no rear extensions.
Although Nos 423, 421, 419 and 417 are a terrace, in fact Nos 421 and 419
have rear elevations which are inset by approximately 0.3 metres from the rear
elevations of Nos 417 and 423 respectively. The rear elevation of No 421 at
first floor level contains a bedroom window and an obscure glazed bathroom
window. The bedroom window is positioned close to the shared boundary with
No 423. The presence of a 4.5 metre deep projecting wall of the proposed first
floor rear extension, in combination with the 0.3 metre inset, would have an
enclosing effect on the outlook from this bedroom window. It would reduce the
general light available into this bedroom and overshadow it in late afternoon. I
find that harm would arise to the living conditions of the occupiers. The harm I
have identified is significant because it is the only source of light for this
bedroom.
8. No 421 has two clear glazed windows at the ground floor level. The existing
single storey extension at the appeal property already results in some
overshadowing in the afternoon. The addition of the first floor extension would
further reduce the light to the ground floor windows and increase the
overshadowing effect. I find that harm would arise to the living conditions of
the occupiers, although this harm is mitigated to a degree by the ground floor
habitable room having more than one window. This does not outweigh the
significant harm that I find in relation to the impact on the first floor bedroom
window.
9. I find that there would be significant and demonstrable harm to the living
conditions at 421 Dallow Road with particular regard to light, outlook and
overshadowing. It would conflict with the aims of saved policies of the Luton
Local Plan, adopted 2006, in particular Policy LP1 regarding sustainable
development; and Policy H4 which requires extensions to avoid a significant
reduction in the living conditions of nearby occupiers.
Other Matters
10. The plans indicate the insertion of a new first floor window in the side elevation
of the original property which would face an existing side window in No 425.
This is of concern to the occupiers of No 425 in terms of overlooking and
privacy. If I were minded to allow this appeal this could be addressed through
the imposition of a suitable planning condition requiring obscure glazing and
the window being fixed closed.
Appeal Decision APP/B0230/D/17/3172959
3
11. The appellant has made reference to other rear extensions on Dallow Road.
However from the limited information before me about the ages of these
extensions and the circumstances of their construction, I find them not to be
sufficiently similar to this appeal proposal. I have, in any case, reached my
own conclusions on the appeal proposal on the basis of the evidence before
me.
Conclusions
12. I conclude that the proposal would significantly harm the character and
appearance of the host property and the surrounding area, and also the living
conditions of No 421 Dallow Road. It would be contrary to the saved policies
LP1, ENV9 and H4 of the Luton Local Plan, adopted 2006.
13. The appeal is dismissed.
Rachael A. Bust
INSPECTOR
Expert Representation
Don't leave your appeal to chance.
Inspectors are inconsistent. We build a technical defense using precedents from our 182,000+ case archive.
No win, no fee Householder representation — you only pay if you win.