Without planning permission, the unauthorised erection of a single storey extension (outlined in blue on the plan attached to the notice for identification purposes); raised platform and steps (outlined in green on the plan for identification purposes); raised hardstanding (outlined in orange on the plan for identification purposes); and boundary wall (identified in yellow on the plan for identification purposes) to the rear of the premises
📊
Borough Success Rate
In London Borough of Enfield, approx 35.6% of Householder developments appeals are successful. (Sample: 741 cases).
Planzo Professional Representation
Don't leave your appeal to chance.
Inspectors are inconsistent. We build a technical defense using precedents from our 182,000 archive.
Fixed-fee Householder representation for £750.
Technical Issues Heatmap
Instant scan of technical battlegrounds available with a Day Pass.
Inspector Profile: McFarlane G
Archive Data: 24 Decisions
Allowance Rate (Householder developments)
4.2%
↓ Strict
National Average (Householder developments)
35.3%
Inspector's Analysis
Appeal Decisions
Site visit made on 19 June 2017
by Gloria McFarlane LLB(Hons) BA(Hons) Solicitor (Non-practising)
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Decision date: 29 June 2017
Appeal Ref: APP/Q5300/C/17/3171761, 3171762, 3171763, 3171764
and 3171765
85 Wynchgate, London, N14 6RJ
The appeals are made under section 174 of the Town an…