← Back to Archive

Development was originally described as “the side elevation has been approved under planning reference 16/02271/FUL/6 with a 500mm set back to the front elevation. On reflection we feel it would look more aesthetically pleasing to bring the extension forward to line through with the main elevation. These properties are unique with the Alpine theme and the set back does not really work in this case

📊

Borough Success Rate

In London Borough of Bromley, approx 40.4% of Householder developments appeals are successful. (Sample: 1228 cases).

Planzo Professional Representation

Don't leave your appeal to chance.

Inspectors are inconsistent. We build a technical defense using precedents from our 182,000 archive.
Fixed-fee Householder representation for £750.

Book Free Review How it works →

Technical Issues Heatmap

Green Belt Character and Appearance Privacy
Keyword Heatmap Locked

Instant scan of technical battlegrounds available with a Day Pass.

Inspector Profile: Jones C

Archive Data: 66 Decisions
Allowance Rate (Householder developments)
31.8% ↓ Strict
National Average (Householder developments)
35.3%

Inspector's Analysis

Appeal Decision Site visit made on 14 March 2017 by Caroline Jones BA (Hons) DipTP MTP MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Decision date: 28 March 2017 Appeal Ref: APP/G5180/D/17/3167330 3 Alpine Copse, Bickley, Bromley BR1 2AW  The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to gran…

Full Analysis Locked

Unlock full text, site maps, and the evidence-ready PDF.

Unlock Case (£10)