Front light well which only belongs to Flat A , Harrington Square 22, was dangerous and represented a severe health hazard as it was made of iron, but very rusty with holes and sharp edges. It was also very steep and narrow. The whole estate has different staircases, some made of cement, some made of bricks, some with tiles and of all sorts of shapes and some have fixed storage units underneath the stairs. Given all these individual characteristics it was not
📊
Borough Success Rate
In London Borough of Camden, approx 31.5% of Householder developments appeals are successful. (Sample: 270 cases).
Planzo Professional Representation
Don't leave your appeal to chance.
Inspectors are inconsistent. We build a technical defense using precedents from our 182,000 archive.
Fixed-fee Householder representation for £750.
Technical Issues Heatmap
Instant scan of technical battlegrounds available with a Day Pass.
Inspector Profile: Hockley J
Archive Data: 99 Decisions
Allowance Rate (Householder developments)
28.3%
↓ Strict
National Average (Householder developments)
35.3%
Inspector's Analysis
Appeal Decisions
Site visit made on 24 March 2017
by Jonathan Hockley BA(Hons) DipTP MRTPI
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Decision date: 07 April 2017
Appeal A: APP/X5210/W/17/3166583
Flat A, 22 Harrington Square, London NW1 2JJ
The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
against a refusal to gran…