Erection of a detached timber framed carport
📊
See the success rate & inspector analytics
Free to view — just create an account, no payment needed.
Sign Up FreeTechnical Issues Heatmap
Character & Appearance
Trees & Landscape
Inspector’s Reasoning
www.planningportal.gov.uk/planninginspectorate
Appeal Decision
Site visit made on 10 January 2017
by R J Marshall LLB DipTP MRTPI
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Decision date: 2 February 2017
Appeal Ref: APP/B1740/D/16/3164045
Two Trees, Victoria Road, Milford-on-Sea SO41 ONL
The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
against a refusal to grant planning permission.
The appeal is made by Mr Raby against the decision of New Forest District Council.
The application Ref 16/10978, dated 11 July 2016, was refused by notice dated 5
September 2016.
The development proposed is erection of a detached timber framed carport.
Decision
1. The appeal is dismissed.
Main Issue
2. The main issue in this appeal is the effect of the proposed development on the
character and appearance of the surrounding area.
Reasons
3. The appeal site lies in a residential area and fronts onto Victoria Road. In the
vicinity of the appeal site, and on the same side of this road, are large
detached dwellings set well back from the highway. This, together with
substantial frontage planting in many cases, gives this side of the road a most
attractive spacious and sylvan appearance. The newly constructed dwelling on
the appeal site is likewise well set back from the road, albeit it has a more
open front garden than is characteristic of the area.
4. The proposed car port would be an attractive structure, open to one side and
with timber clad walls on the remaining elevations. The roof would be pitched
and fully hipped and have clay tiles to match the new house. I see no
objection, therefore, to the design of the car port.
5. However, it would be erected in the front garden of the appeal property in an
area where, on the same side of the road, there appear to be other no other
car ports or similar structures in front gardens to disrupt the spacious and
sylvan appearance of the area. The car port would, therefore, be located in a
way that would make it appear out of keeping with the attractive
characteristics of this part of the road.
6. I appreciate that a 1.8 metre high close board fence and wooden gates of
around the same height would screen much of the proposed development bar
the roof. However, views of the roof alone would make the car port appear
Appeal Decision APP/B1740/D/16/3164045
www.planningportal.gov.uk/planninginspectorate 2
intrusive and out of keeping in this setting Moreover, with the gates open the
car port would be more visible. Existing planting would not provide a fully
effective screen, and although new planting could potentially add to the degree
of screening it would take a long time to become fully effective. Nor could it be
guaranteed to remain in place. It is unwise, therefore, to rely on the potential
for new planting to ameliorate the impact of the proposal.
7. It is concluded that the proposed development would detract from the
character and appearance of the surrounding area. There would be conflict
with Policy CS2 of the Core Strategy for the New Forest District Council outside
the National Park which requires new development to contribute positively to
local distinctiveness and be appropriate and sympathetic to its setting.
Conclusion
8. For the reasons given above it is concluded that the appeal should be
dismissed.
R J Marshall
INSPECTOR
Expert Representation
Don't leave your appeal to chance.
Inspectors are inconsistent. We build a technical defense using precedents from our 182,000+ case archive.
No win, no fee Householder representation — you only pay if you win.