← Back to Archive

Rear Dormer has been built without planning permission. The rear dormer is not permitted development under the terms of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development (England) Order (2015), as amended, Schedule 2, Part 1, Class B, in that:- 1) The eaves of the original roof have not been maintained or reinstated; and

📊

Borough Success Rate

In Epsom and Ewell Borough Council, approx 34.8% of Householder developments appeals are successful. (Sample: 141 cases).

Planzo Professional Representation

Don't leave your appeal to chance.

Inspectors are inconsistent. We build a technical defense using precedents from our 182,000 archive.
Fixed-fee Householder representation for £750.

Book Free Review How it works →

Technical Issues Heatmap

Green Belt Character and Appearance Privacy
Keyword Heatmap Locked

Instant scan of technical battlegrounds available with a Day Pass.

Inspector Profile: Morden DE

Archive Data: 5 Decisions
Allowance Rate (Householder developments)
80.0% ↑ High
National Average (Householder developments)
35.3%

Inspector's Analysis

https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate Appeal Decision Hearing held and site inspection made on 20 March 2018 by D E Morden MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 23 August 2018 Appeal Ref: APP/P3610/C/16/3163706 7 Persfield Close, Ewell, Surrey, KT17 1PQ  The appeal is made under section 174 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as amended b…

Full Analysis Locked

Unlock full text, site maps, and the evidence-ready PDF.

Unlock Case (£10)