Rear extension of the following dimensions (i) a maximum height to ridge of 3.7 metres (ii) a maximum height to eaves of 2.6 metres (iii) a maximum projection of 6.0 metres along the adjoining boundary and inset from the boundary of 0.2 metres (iv) a maximum width of 4.0 metres
📊
Borough Success Rate
In South Tyneside Council, approx 32.8% of Householder developments appeals are successful. (Sample: 61 cases).
Planzo Professional Representation
Don't leave your appeal to chance.
Inspectors are inconsistent. We build a technical defense using precedents from our 182,000 archive.
Fixed-fee Householder representation for £750.
Technical Issues Heatmap
Instant scan of technical battlegrounds available with a Day Pass.
Inspector Profile: Hill ZH
Archive Data: 19 Decisions
Allowance Rate (Householder developments)
5.3%
↓ Strict
National Average (Householder developments)
35.3%
Inspector's Analysis
Appeal Decision
Site visit made on 21 November 2016
by Mrs Zoë Hill BA(Hons) Dip Bldg Cons(RICS) MRTPI IHBC
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Decision date: 6 December 2016
Appeal Ref: APP/A4520/D/16/3160508
45 High Meadow, Horsley Hill, South Shields NE34 6JJ
The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 19…