Without planning permission: 1) The material change of use of the premises to use as self-contained flats; 2) The erection of a single storey extension in the approximate position edged in green on the attached plan; and 3) The erection of a roof enlargement to the rear roof slope and rear wing of the premises in the approximate position edged blue on the attached plan
📊
Borough Success Rate
In Birmingham City Council, approx 31.0% of Householder developments appeals are successful. (Sample: 377 cases).
Planzo Professional Representation
Don't leave your appeal to chance.
Inspectors are inconsistent. We build a technical defense using precedents from our 182,000 archive.
Fixed-fee Householder representation for £750.
Technical Issues Heatmap
Instant scan of technical battlegrounds available with a Day Pass.
Inspector Profile: Preston C
Archive Data: 56 Decisions
Allowance Rate (Householder developments)
32.1%
↓ Strict
National Average (Householder developments)
35.3%
Inspector's Analysis
Appeal Decision
Site visit made on 7 February 2017
by Chris Preston BA(Hons) BPl MRTPI
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Decision date: 2 March 2017
Appeal Ref: APP/P4605/C/16/3158643
119 Warwards Lane, Selly Oak, Birmingham B29 7QX
The appeal is made under section 174 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as
amended by the Planni…