Modified first floor extension. The design substantially reduces the impact of the extended areas and responds to the Inspector's decision by providing: a smaller structure which is no longer "box-like"; reduced width and depth (c. 2.5 by 2.6m); the reduced roof and pitch to the end provides an improved integration with the dwelling as a whole; and removal of the window considered to be "wide and incongruous”
📊
Borough Success Rate
In Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council, approx 42.3% of Householder developments appeals are successful. (Sample: 799 cases).
Planzo Professional Representation
Don't leave your appeal to chance.
Inspectors are inconsistent. We build a technical defense using precedents from our 182,000 archive.
Fixed-fee Householder representation for £750.
Technical Issues Heatmap
Instant scan of technical battlegrounds available with a Day Pass.
Inspector Profile: Bridgwater J
Archive Data: 40 Decisions
Allowance Rate (Householder developments)
45.0%
↑ High
National Average (Householder developments)
35.3%
Inspector's Analysis
Appeal Decision
Site visit made on 24 October 2016
by Jameson Bridgwater PGDipTP MRTPI
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Decision date: 24th November 2016
Appeal Ref: APP/L5810/D/16/3156610
45 Park Road, Hampton Wick, Kingston upon Thames KT1 4AS
The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
against a…