Without planning permission, the unauthorised erection of a single storey rear extension (outlined in blue on the attached plan for identification purposes) to the rear of the Premises in excess of the parameters set out within Article 3 and Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015
📊
Borough Success Rate
In London Borough of Enfield, approx 35.6% of Householder developments appeals are successful. (Sample: 741 cases).
Planzo Professional Representation
Don't leave your appeal to chance.
Inspectors are inconsistent. We build a technical defense using precedents from our 182,000 archive.
Fixed-fee Householder representation for £750.
Technical Issues Heatmap
Instant scan of technical battlegrounds available with a Day Pass.
Inspector Profile: Lloyd I
Archive Data: 8 Decisions
Allowance Rate (Householder developments)
37.5%
↑ High
National Average (Householder developments)
35.3%
Inspector's Analysis
Appeal Decision
Site visit made on 22 November 2016
by Iwan Lloyd BA BTP MRTPI
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Decision date: 21 December 2016
Appeal Ref: APP/Q5300/C/16/3149616
39 St. Edmunds Road, London N9 7PU
The appeal is made under section 174 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as
amended by the Planning and Compensat…