Breach of planning control alleged in the notice was: Without planning permission, the unauthorised erection of a single storey rear extension (outlined in blue for identification purposes on the plan attached to the notice), to the rear of the premises in excess of the parameters set out within Article 3 and Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015
📊
Borough Success Rate
In London Borough of Enfield, approx 35.6% of Householder developments appeals are successful. (Sample: 741 cases).
Planzo Professional Representation
Don't leave your appeal to chance.
Inspectors are inconsistent. We build a technical defense using precedents from our 182,000 archive.
Fixed-fee Householder representation for £750.
Technical Issues Heatmap
Instant scan of technical battlegrounds available with a Day Pass.
Inspector Profile: Whalley J
Archive Data: 105 Decisions
Allowance Rate (Householder developments)
29.5%
↓ Strict
National Average (Householder developments)
35.3%
Inspector's Analysis
www.planningportal.gov.uk/planninginspectorate
Appeal Decision
Site visit made on 30 November 2016
by John Whalley
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Decision date: 12 December 2016
Appeal ref: APP/Q5300/C/16/3149690
8 Church Road, Enfield EN3 4NT
The appeal was made by Mrs Pembe Kemal under Section 174 of the Town and
Cou…