Without planning permission, the unauthorised erection of a single storey canopy structure (outline in blue on the attached plan for identification purposes) to the rear of the Premises, in excess of the parameters set out within Article 3 and Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015
📊
Borough Success Rate
In London Borough of Enfield, approx 35.6% of Householder developments appeals are successful. (Sample: 741 cases).
Planzo Professional Representation
Don't leave your appeal to chance.
Inspectors are inconsistent. We build a technical defense using precedents from our 182,000 archive.
Fixed-fee Householder representation for £750.
Technical Issues Heatmap
Instant scan of technical battlegrounds available with a Day Pass.
Inspector Profile: Richards DYB
Archive Data: 11 Decisions
Allowance Rate (Householder developments)
54.5%
↑ High
National Average (Householder developments)
35.3%
Inspector's Analysis
www.planningportal.gov.uk/planninginspectorate
Appeal Decision
Site visit made on 22 November 2016
by David Richards B Soc Sci DipTP MRTPI
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Decision date: 7 December 2016
Appeal Ref: APP/Q5300/C/16/3149551
1 Lathkill Close, Enfield, EN1 1HA
The appeal is made under section 174 of the Town and …