Breach of planning control as alleged in paragraph 3 of the notice is: “Without planning permission, the unauthorised single storey rear extension at Premises in excess of the parameters set out within Article 3 and Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 and the installation of french (sic) windows at first floor rear level
📊
Borough Success Rate
In London Borough of Enfield, approx 35.6% of Householder developments appeals are successful. (Sample: 741 cases).
Planzo Professional Representation
Don't leave your appeal to chance.
Inspectors are inconsistent. We build a technical defense using precedents from our 182,000 archive.
Fixed-fee Householder representation for £750.
Technical Issues Heatmap
Instant scan of technical battlegrounds available with a Day Pass.
Inspector Profile: Dale AJ
Archive Data: 48 Decisions
Allowance Rate (Householder developments)
33.3%
↓ Strict
National Average (Householder developments)
35.3%
Inspector's Analysis
Appeal Decision
Site visit made on 28 September 2016
by Andrew Dale BA (Hons) MA MRTPI
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Decision date: 13 October 2016
Appeal Ref: APP/Q5300/C/16/3146009
74 Broomfield Avenue, London N13 4JP
The appeal is made under section 174 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as
amended by the Planning and…