Use for which a lawful development certificate is sought is described in the application as “erection of timber slatted screen on mansard roof. Screen to be positioned next to southwest chimney stack” and, in the Council’s Notice of Refusal, as “erection of timber slatted screen on mansard roof (Certificate of Lawfulness of proposed work to a listed building). Submitted drawing Nos. /CL/15/05570 and applicant’s drawing Nos. C13141-104-A, 2 unnumbered sectional sketches, unnumbered
📊
Borough Success Rate
In Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, approx 42.8% of Householder developments appeals are successful. (Sample: 407 cases).
Planzo Professional Representation
Don't leave your appeal to chance.
Inspectors are inconsistent. We build a technical defense using precedents from our 182,000 archive.
Fixed-fee Householder representation for £750.
Technical Issues Heatmap
Instant scan of technical battlegrounds available with a Day Pass.
Inspector Profile: Bourne F
Archive Data: 9 Decisions
Allowance Rate (Householder developments)
33.3%
↓ Strict
National Average (Householder developments)
35.3%
Inspector's Analysis
1
Appeal Decisions
Accompanied site visit made on 26 July 2016
by Felix Bourne BA(Hons) LARTPI Solicitor
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Decision date: 25 October 2016
Appeal refs: APP/K5600/X/15/3140834 (APPEAL A) &
APP/K5600/Y/15/3140833 (APPEAL B)
8 Campden Hill Square, London, W8 7LB
Appeal A is made under section 2…