Removal of the pitched roof of the back addition installation of a door in the rear elevation of the roof extension to the back addition and erection of parapet walls around the remainder of the flat roof of the back addition in connection with its use as a roof terrace contrary to conditions 02 and 08 of planning permission (ref: 2012/02112/FUL) which state: 02 The development hereby permitted shall be built in complete accordance with the
📊
Borough Success Rate
In London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham, approx 40.4% of Householder developments appeals are successful. (Sample: 356 cases).
Planzo Professional Representation
Don't leave your appeal to chance.
Inspectors are inconsistent. We build a technical defense using precedents from our 182,000 archive.
Fixed-fee Householder representation for £750.
Technical Issues Heatmap
Instant scan of technical battlegrounds available with a Day Pass.
Inspector Profile: Kean G
Archive Data: 38 Decisions
Allowance Rate (Householder developments)
26.3%
↓ Strict
National Average (Householder developments)
35.3%
Inspector's Analysis
Appeal Decision
Site visit made on 11 August 2016
by Grahame Kean B.A. (Hons), PgCert CIPFA, Solicitor HCA
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Decision date: 21 September 2016
Appeal Ref: APP/H5390/C/15/3140464
10 Marville Road, London SW6 7BD
The appeal is made under section 174 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as
amended by …